Send us an email:
info@mdrc-services.com

Or use the contact form below

 

Understanding MDR Annex IX. Conformity assessment based on a Quality Management System and Technical Documentation

Annex IX of the Medical Device Regulation 2017/745 defines the conformity assessment process for medical devices based on a Quality Management System and Technical Documentation review. This is one of the most commonly used pathways for obtaining CE certification, particularly for manufacturers that already have an ISO 13485-compliant QMS in place.

Annex IX is divided into three chapters, each covering different aspects of the conformity assessment process. These chapters determine how manufacturers demonstrate compliance with MDR requirements based on the risk classification of the device, the complexity of its design, and the manufacturer’s existing quality assurance processes.

Chapter I: Quality Management System assessment

The first chapter outlines the general requirements for manufacturers implementing and maintaining a Quality Management System. The Notified Body (NB) must assess the QMS to ensure compliance with MDR provisions, covering aspects such as:

  • Design, manufacturing, and final product inspection
  • Risk management procedures
  • Post-market surveillance and vigilance system
  • Technical documentation maintenance

The QMS must ensure compliance with the General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPR) of MDR. Manufacturers are required to demonstrate that their devices are consistently manufactured and controlled according to these standards.

Chapter I is applicable to:

  • Class IIa, IIb, and III devices where a full QMS-based approach is preferred
  • Manufacturers seeking a comprehensive assessment of their production and design controls
  • Companies that require periodic audits and ongoing surveillance by a Notified Body

This assessment is not applicable to Class I devices unless they require Notified Body involvement (such as for sterile or measuring functions).

Chapter II: assessment of Technical Documentation

The second chapter focuses on the technical documentation review by the Notified Body. This is a critical step in ensuring that the device meets performance, safety, and regulatory compliance requirements under MDR.

The Notified Body examines elements such as:

  • Device description and specifications
  • Risk management procedures and clinical evaluation
  • Verification and validation data
  • Post-market surveillance planning

For Class IIa and IIb devices, the Notified Body assesses technical documentation using a sampling approach, meaning not every single file is reviewed. However, for Class III devices, the Notified Body must review each individual device and its full technical documentation.

Chapter II applies to:

  • Manufacturers of Class IIa, IIb, and III devices that require technical documentation assessment
  • Devices that have undergone significant design modifications requiring reassessment
  • High-risk Class III devices, where all documentation must be reviewed before certification

This chapter does not apply to Class I devices, as they are self-certified by the manufacturer unless they involve special conditions like sterilization or measuring functions.

Chapter III: administrative provisions

The third chapter of Annex IX details the administrative processes that govern the interactions between manufacturers, Notified Bodies, and regulatory authorities. This includes:

  • Surveillance and unannounced audits to ensure continued compliance with the approved QMS
  • Certificate modifications and validity periods
  • Manufacturer obligations regarding documentation updates
  • Rules for withdrawing or suspending certificates in cases of non-compliance

Chapter III applies to:

  • All manufacturers undergoing conformity assessment under Annex IX
  • Companies seeking certificate renewals or making changes to their approved QMS
  • Notified Bodies performing periodic audits and market surveillance activities

This chapter ensures that manufacturers maintain compliance even after obtaining their CE certification by requiring continued monitoring, corrective actions for non-conformities, and re-evaluation of the certification if significant changes occur.

When is Annex IX the preferred route?

Annex IX is the most commonly used conformity assessment procedure under MDR, particularly for manufacturers with an ISO 13485-compliant QMS. It is preferred when:

  • A comprehensive QMS-based approach is required for certification
  • The manufacturer regularly updates technical documentation and requires ongoing Notified Body oversight
  • The device falls under Class IIa, IIb, or III, requiring Notified Body involvement in the conformity assessment
  • The manufacturer wants a single conformity assessment route covering both QMS and technical documentation

Conclusion

Annex IX of MDR provides a structured approach for medical device manufacturers to demonstrate compliance through a Quality Management System assessment and Technical Documentation review. The three chapters of this annex define different levels of assessment, from evaluating the manufacturer’s quality procedures and risk management to ensuring compliance through continuous Notified Body oversight.

We will help you obtain all the necessary certificates.

Learn more >>

What you need to have to succeed in certification and sell your products in the EU:

PRRC

Learn more >>

Clinical
evaluation
Learn more >>

Post-marketing
surveillance
Learn more >>

What you need to know to succeed in certification and sell your products in the EU:

CE-marking process under MDR

Learn more >>

CE-marking process under IVDR

Learn more >>

MDR checklist
Learn more >>

Understanding MDR Annex IX. Conformity assessment based on a Quality Management System and Technical Documentation

Annex IX of the Medical Device Regulation 2017/745 defines the conformity assessment process for medical devices based on a Quality Management System and Technical Documentation review. This is one of the most commonly used pathways for obtaining CE certification, particularly for manufacturers that already have an ISO 13485-compliant QMS in place.

Annex IX is divided into three chapters, each covering different aspects of the conformity assessment process. These chapters determine how manufacturers demonstrate compliance with MDR requirements based on the risk classification of the device, the complexity of its design, and the manufacturer’s existing quality assurance processes.

Chapter I: Quality Management System assessment

The first chapter outlines the general requirements for manufacturers implementing and maintaining a Quality Management System. The Notified Body (NB) must assess the QMS to ensure compliance with MDR provisions, covering aspects such as:

  • Design, manufacturing, and final product inspection
  • Risk management procedures
  • Post-market surveillance and vigilance system
  • Technical documentation maintenance

The QMS must ensure compliance with the General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPR) of MDR. Manufacturers are required to demonstrate that their devices are consistently manufactured and controlled according to these standards.

Chapter I is applicable to:

  • Class IIa, IIb, and III devices where a full QMS-based approach is preferred
  • Manufacturers seeking a comprehensive assessment of their production and design controls
  • Companies that require periodic audits and ongoing surveillance by a Notified Body

This assessment is not applicable to Class I devices unless they require Notified Body involvement (such as for sterile or measuring functions).

Chapter II: assessment of Technical Documentation

The second chapter focuses on the technical documentation review by the Notified Body. This is a critical step in ensuring that the device meets performance, safety, and regulatory compliance requirements under MDR.

The Notified Body examines elements such as:

  • Device description and specifications
  • Risk management procedures and clinical evaluation
  • Verification and validation data
  • Post-market surveillance planning

For Class IIa and IIb devices, the Notified Body assesses technical documentation using a sampling approach, meaning not every single file is reviewed. However, for Class III devices, the Notified Body must review each individual device and its full technical documentation.

Chapter II applies to:

  • Manufacturers of Class IIa, IIb, and III devices that require technical documentation assessment
  • Devices that have undergone significant design modifications requiring reassessment
  • High-risk Class III devices, where all documentation must be reviewed before certification

This chapter does not apply to Class I devices, as they are self-certified by the manufacturer unless they involve special conditions like sterilization or measuring functions.

Chapter III: administrative provisions

The third chapter of Annex IX details the administrative processes that govern the interactions between manufacturers, Notified Bodies, and regulatory authorities. This includes:

  • Surveillance and unannounced audits to ensure continued compliance with the approved QMS
  • Certificate modifications and validity periods
  • Manufacturer obligations regarding documentation updates
  • Rules for withdrawing or suspending certificates in cases of non-compliance

Chapter III applies to:

  • All manufacturers undergoing conformity assessment under Annex IX
  • Companies seeking certificate renewals or making changes to their approved QMS
  • Notified Bodies performing periodic audits and market surveillance activities

This chapter ensures that manufacturers maintain compliance even after obtaining their CE certification by requiring continued monitoring, corrective actions for non-conformities, and re-evaluation of the certification if significant changes occur.

When is Annex IX the preferred route?

Annex IX is the most commonly used conformity assessment procedure under MDR, particularly for manufacturers with an ISO 13485-compliant QMS. It is preferred when:

  • A comprehensive QMS-based approach is required for certification
  • The manufacturer regularly updates technical documentation and requires ongoing Notified Body oversight
  • The device falls under Class IIa, IIb, or III, requiring Notified Body involvement in the conformity assessment
  • The manufacturer wants a single conformity assessment route covering both QMS and technical documentation

Conclusion

Annex IX of MDR provides a structured approach for medical device manufacturers to demonstrate compliance through a Quality Management System assessment and Technical Documentation review. The three chapters of this annex define different levels of assessment, from evaluating the manufacturer’s quality procedures and risk management to ensuring compliance through continuous Notified Body oversight.

Further reading

CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate

Basic UDI-DI (bUDI) - what is it, where to obtain it, and what to do with it

EUDAMED registration - a brief guide

Contract with the Authorised Representative in the European Union (Authorised Representative Mandate)

GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements for medical devices in the European Union

How to obtain CE marking for medical software under the EU MDR or IVDR?

Technical documentation for Medical Device Software in the EU

IEC 62304 - the pivotal standard for software medical devices

Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics

ISO and IEC standards for medical device software

Clinical Evaluation, PMCF, and PMS in Medical Device Lifecycle

Notified Bodies and their role in certification of medical devices

What is NANDO and why medical device companies should know about it?

Labeling and UDI requirements for medical devices in the EU

Understanding the roles of Authorised Representatives and Importers under MDR/IVDR

MDR implementation - challenges and solutions

Post-market surveillance under MDR and IVDR - requirements and best practices

Notified Body audit - a manufacturer's guide

Risk management plan - guide for medical device companies

Should my medical device comply with GDPR?

EC-certificate for a medical device - Q&A

How long does it take to CE-mark a medical device?

What is a PRRC?

Essential requirements for importers and distributors under MDR and IVDR

Language requirements for IFUs and labels under the MDR and IVDR

Legal Manufacturer and Original Equipment Manufacturer in medical devices

How to structure a PRRC contract for effective compliance

How to Create a Declaration of Conformity According to MDR or IVDR

All articles >>

Get in touch

We're ready to help you. Contact us whether you have a question about our solutions or need help with regulatory issues

Our EU office

MedDev Compliance Ltd
Souliou 1, Strovolos, 2018 Nicosia, Cyprus
Phone: +357 22253765
Email: info@mdrc-services.com
 

©2025 MDRC - Medical Devices Regulatory Compliance

Useful information

CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate

Basic UDI-DI (bUDI)

EUDAMED registration - a brief guide

Authorised Representative Mandate

GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements

How to obtain CE marking for medical software under the EU MDR or IVDR?

Technical documentation for Medical Device Software in the EU

Read more >>


Cookie Policy

We only use essential cookies that enable core functionality and proper operation of the website. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of the essential cookies. You may disable these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We do not use our own or third-party analytical, preferences, statistics, marketing, functional, advertisement, performance or any other non-essential cookies.

Send us an email:
info@mdrc-services.com

Or use the contact form below

 

Solutions

EU Authorised Representative (EC REP)

EU PRRC

Technical documentation

Risk management

Clinical evaluation

Notified Bodies

Quality management system

Post-market surveillance

Resources

Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics

CE-marking process for medical devices

CE-marking process for in vitro diagnostic medical devices

PRRC under MDR or IVDR

UDI infographic

EUDAMED registration step by step instruction

ISO 14155:2020 structure and content

Checklists

MDR technical documentation checklist

IVDR technical documentation checklist

Technical documentation checklist for medical device software (MDSW)

MDR-compliant quality system documentation checklist

Clinical Evaluation Plan checklist

Clinical Evaluation Report checklist

All checklists >>

Articles

CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate

Basic UDI-DI (bUDI)

EUDAMED registration - a brief guide

Authorised Representative Mandate

GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements

More articles >>

Devices

General medical devices and equipment

In vitro diagnostics (IVD)

Medical software

Cookie Policy

We only use essential cookies that enable core functionality and proper operation of the website. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of the essential cookies. You may disable these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We do not use our own or third-party analytical, preferences, statistics, marketing, functional, advertisement, performance or any other non-essential cookies.