Or use the contact form below
Medical device manufacturers operating in the European Union must have a regulatory compliance strategy in place as required by Article 10(9a) of the MDR (EU 2017/745). This requirement isn’t just about having the right documentation. It’s about demonstrating a structured and proactive approach to compliance.
One of the key challenges manufacturers face is proving to a notified body that they have a comprehensive strategy to maintain regulatory compliance. This is particularly important during initial audits, conformity assessments, and ongoing surveillance. But what exactly does this strategy involve, and how can manufacturers demonstrate it effectively?
A regulatory compliance strategy is essentially a roadmap that guides a manufacturer in achieving and maintaining compliance throughout the entire lifecycle of their medical devices. It is not just a single document but a structured system of policies, procedures, and plans that ensure the manufacturer consistently meets the requirements of the MDR and other applicable regulations.
This strategy needs to be tailored to the manufacturer’s specific products and markets while also addressing:
The regulatory compliance strategy isn’t a static document. It must evolve as regulations change, new risks emerge, or updates are made to the technical documentation and clinical evaluation of a device.
First off, you should have a policy or procedure for regulatory compliance strategy. But that's not it. When a notified body audits a manufacturer, they don’t just look at whether a strategy exists. They assess whether it is being properly implemented and followed. To demonstrate compliance effectively, manufacturers should have:
Having these elements in place and clearly documented, a manufacturer can confidently present its regulatory compliance strategy during notified body assessments and avoid delays in the certification process.
A compliance strategy policy or procedure should be structured to provide a clear framework for regulatory adherence. Below is an example based on best practices. It should be adjusted to you company's situation.
The objective of this strategy is to outline the regulatory compliance framework followed by [Company Name] to ensure that all medical devices conform to MDR (EU 2017/745) and other applicable regulations. This strategy defines the roles, responsibilities, and processes necessary for achieving and maintaining compliance throughout the product lifecycle.
The Regulatory Affairs Team is responsible for continuously monitoring EU regulations, MDCG guidance documents, harmonized standards, and notified body requirements. Any regulatory changes that impact the compliance strategy will be analyzed, and necessary actions will be implemented.
Each device is classified according to Annex VIII of the MDR to determine the appropriate conformity assessment pathway. The Regulatory Affairs Team ensures that all necessary documentation and testing are in place before submitting applications to a Notified Body.
All technical documentation is compiled, reviewed, and updated as required under Annexes II and III of MDR. This includes:
The Quality Management Team ensures that document control procedures maintain traceability, version control, and accessibility for audits.
A structured Clinical Evaluation Plan (CEP) is implemented to assess the safety and performance of devices based on clinical data, literature reviews, and post-market feedback. PMCF studies are conducted as necessary to provide ongoing evidence of compliance with General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPRs).
Risk management is conducted in accordance with ISO 14971, identifying, evaluating, and mitigating risks throughout the device’s lifecycle. A PMS Plan is established, ensuring continuous monitoring of device performance, complaint handling, and trend analysis. Field Safety Corrective Actions (FSCAs) and vigilance reporting are managed according to MDR timelines.
[Company Name] ensures active collaboration with Notified Bodies for:
All regulatory submissions, corrective actions, and risk updates are communicated transparently to regulatory authorities.
Personnel involved in regulatory compliance, quality assurance, and clinical affairs undergo regular training to stay updated on MDR requirements. Internal audits are conducted periodically to identify and address compliance gaps.
All regulatory records, certificates, and compliance-related reports are maintained for at least 10 years after the last device is placed on the market, ensuring traceability and regulatory preparedness.
A solid regulatory compliance strategy is not just about passing audits. It’s about ensuring that medical devices remain safe, effective, and compliant throughout their lifecycle. By having a clear, structured, and well-documented approach, manufacturers can confidently demonstrate compliance to notified bodies and maintain smooth market access in the EU.
Contact us >>
Notified body
certificate
Learn more >>
Basic UDI
Learn more >>
EUDAMED registration
Learn more >>
CE-marking process under MDR
Learn more >>
CE-marking process under IVDR
Learn more >>
MDR checklist
Learn more >>
Medical device manufacturers operating in the European Union must have a regulatory compliance strategy in place as required by Article 10(9a) of the MDR (EU 2017/745). This requirement isn’t just about having the right documentation. It’s about demonstrating a structured and proactive approach to compliance.
One of the key challenges manufacturers face is proving to a notified body that they have a comprehensive strategy to maintain regulatory compliance. This is particularly important during initial audits, conformity assessments, and ongoing surveillance. But what exactly does this strategy involve, and how can manufacturers demonstrate it effectively?
A regulatory compliance strategy is essentially a roadmap that guides a manufacturer in achieving and maintaining compliance throughout the entire lifecycle of their medical devices. It is not just a single document but a structured system of policies, procedures, and plans that ensure the manufacturer consistently meets the requirements of the MDR and other applicable regulations.
This strategy needs to be tailored to the manufacturer’s specific products and markets while also addressing:
The regulatory compliance strategy isn’t a static document. It must evolve as regulations change, new risks emerge, or updates are made to the technical documentation and clinical evaluation of a device.
First off, you should have a policy or procedure for regulatory compliance strategy. But that's not it. When a notified body audits a manufacturer, they don’t just look at whether a strategy exists. They assess whether it is being properly implemented and followed. To demonstrate compliance effectively, manufacturers should have:
Having these elements in place and clearly documented, a manufacturer can confidently present its regulatory compliance strategy during notified body assessments and avoid delays in the certification process.
A compliance strategy policy or procedure should be structured to provide a clear framework for regulatory adherence. Below is an example based on best practices. It should be adjusted to you company's situation.
The objective of this strategy is to outline the regulatory compliance framework followed by [Company Name] to ensure that all medical devices conform to MDR (EU 2017/745) and other applicable regulations. This strategy defines the roles, responsibilities, and processes necessary for achieving and maintaining compliance throughout the product lifecycle.
The Regulatory Affairs Team is responsible for continuously monitoring EU regulations, MDCG guidance documents, harmonized standards, and notified body requirements. Any regulatory changes that impact the compliance strategy will be analyzed, and necessary actions will be implemented.
Each device is classified according to Annex VIII of the MDR to determine the appropriate conformity assessment pathway. The Regulatory Affairs Team ensures that all necessary documentation and testing are in place before submitting applications to a Notified Body.
All technical documentation is compiled, reviewed, and updated as required under Annexes II and III of MDR. This includes:
The Quality Management Team ensures that document control procedures maintain traceability, version control, and accessibility for audits.
A structured Clinical Evaluation Plan (CEP) is implemented to assess the safety and performance of devices based on clinical data, literature reviews, and post-market feedback. PMCF studies are conducted as necessary to provide ongoing evidence of compliance with General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPRs).
Risk management is conducted in accordance with ISO 14971, identifying, evaluating, and mitigating risks throughout the device’s lifecycle. A PMS Plan is established, ensuring continuous monitoring of device performance, complaint handling, and trend analysis. Field Safety Corrective Actions (FSCAs) and vigilance reporting are managed according to MDR timelines.
[Company Name] ensures active collaboration with Notified Bodies for:
All regulatory submissions, corrective actions, and risk updates are communicated transparently to regulatory authorities.
Personnel involved in regulatory compliance, quality assurance, and clinical affairs undergo regular training to stay updated on MDR requirements. Internal audits are conducted periodically to identify and address compliance gaps.
All regulatory records, certificates, and compliance-related reports are maintained for at least 10 years after the last device is placed on the market, ensuring traceability and regulatory preparedness.
A solid regulatory compliance strategy is not just about passing audits. It’s about ensuring that medical devices remain safe, effective, and compliant throughout their lifecycle. By having a clear, structured, and well-documented approach, manufacturers can confidently demonstrate compliance to notified bodies and maintain smooth market access in the EU.
Clinical Evaluation, PMCF, and PMS in Medical Device Lifecycle
How clinical investigations fit into the MDR-compliant clinical evaluation process
Legacy Device Timelines and Deadlines Under IVDR Amendments
Is your software a medical device or an accessory? Understanding EU MDR classification
GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements for medical devices in the European Union
Should my medical device comply with GDPR?
Understanding MDA, MDN, MDS, and MDT codes in the context of MDR and IVDR
CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate
Basic UDI-DI (bUDI) - what is it, where to obtain it, and what to do with it
EUDAMED registration - a brief guide
Contract with the Authorised Representative in the European Union (Authorised Representative Mandate)
GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements for medical devices in the European Union
How to obtain CE marking for medical software under the EU MDR or IVDR?
Technical documentation for Medical Device Software in the EU
IEC 62304 - the pivotal standard for software medical devices
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics
ISO and IEC standards for medical device software
Clinical Evaluation, PMCF, and PMS in Medical Device Lifecycle
Notified Bodies and their role in certification of medical devices
What is NANDO and why medical device companies should know about it?
Labeling and UDI requirements for medical devices in the EU
Understanding the roles of Authorised Representatives and Importers under MDR/IVDR
MDR implementation - challenges and solutions
Post-market surveillance under MDR and IVDR - requirements and best practices
Notified Body audit - a manufacturer's guide
Risk management plan - guide for medical device companies
Should my medical device comply with GDPR?
EC-certificate for a medical device - Q&A
How long does it take to CE-mark a medical device?
What is a PRRC?
Essential requirements for importers and distributors under MDR and IVDR
Language requirements for IFUs and labels under the MDR and IVDR
Legal Manufacturer and Original Equipment Manufacturer in medical devices
How to structure a PRRC contract for effective compliance
How to Create a Declaration of Conformity According to MDR or IVDR
All articles >>
We're ready to help you. Contact us whether you have a question about our solutions or need help with regulatory issues
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics
CE-marking process for medical devices
CE-marking process for in vitro diagnostic medical devices
UDI infographic
EUDAMED registration step by step instruction
ISO 14155:2020 structure and content
MDR technical documentation checklist
IVDR technical documentation checklist
Technical documentation checklist for medical device software (MDSW)
MDR-compliant quality system documentation checklist
Clinical Evaluation Plan checklist
Clinical Evaluation Report checklist
All checklists >>
CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate
Basic UDI-DI (bUDI)
EUDAMED registration - a brief guide
Authorised Representative Mandate
GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements
How to obtain CE marking for medical software under the EU MDR or IVDR?
Technical documentation for Medical Device Software in the EU
Read more >>
We only use essential cookies that enable core functionality and proper operation of the website. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of the essential cookies. You may disable these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We do not use our own or third-party analytical, preferences, statistics, marketing, functional, advertisement, performance or any other non-essential cookies.
Or use the contact form below
Solutions
EU Authorised Representative (EC REP)
EU PRRC
Technical documentation
Risk management
Clinical evaluation
Notified Bodies
Quality management system
Post-market surveillance
Resources
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics
CE-marking process for medical devices
CE-marking process for in vitro diagnostic medical devices
PRRC under MDR or IVDR
UDI infographic
EUDAMED registration step by step instruction
ISO 14155:2020 structure and content
MDR technical documentation checklist
IVDR technical documentation checklist
Technical documentation checklist for medical device software (MDSW)
MDR-compliant quality system documentation checklist
Clinical Evaluation Plan checklist
Clinical Evaluation Report checklist
All checklists >>
Articles
CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate
Basic UDI-DI (bUDI)
EUDAMED registration - a brief guide
Authorised Representative Mandate
GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements
More articles >>
Devices
General medical devices and equipment
In vitro diagnostics (IVD)
Medical software
We only use essential cookies that enable core functionality and proper operation of the website. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of the essential cookies. You may disable these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We do not use our own or third-party analytical, preferences, statistics, marketing, functional, advertisement, performance or any other non-essential cookies.