The Clinical Evaluation Report is crucial as it provides documented evidence of a medical device's safety, performance, and clinical benefits, ensuring compliance with EU MDR requirements.
The CER is so critical that Notified Bodies often assign specialized auditors to review it thoroughly, reflecting its central role in ensuring compliance with EU MDR requirements.
Fill out the Device field, check the checkboxes for available requirements and N/A boxes for requirements that do not apply to your device and print out or create a PDF-document.
1 | Summary | ||
2 | Introduction | ||
3 | Terminology and device definition | ||
4 | Identification of the manufacturer | ||
5 | Identification of the subject device | ||
5.1 | Intended use | ||
5.2 | Classification | ||
5.3 | Device’s marketing history | ||
5.4 | Technical description, product design and characteristics | ||
5.4.1 | Identification of applied standards | ||
5.4.2 | Applied tests and quality criteria | ||
6 | Identification of target groups, indications, contraindications and clinical application | ||
6.1 | Intended patient target groups | ||
6.2 | User profile | ||
6.3 | Indications | ||
6.4 | Contraindications / limitations | ||
6.5 | Clinical application | ||
6.6 | Warnings and precautions | ||
6.7 | Clinical performance and degree of innovation | ||
7 | Risk analysis and risk management | ||
7.1 | General | ||
7.2 | Risk analysis and management file | ||
8 | Identification of relevant GSPRs | ||
9 | Alternative treatments and equivalent devices | ||
9.1 | Identification of alternative devices | ||
9.1.1 | Search methodology | ||
9.2 | Alternative devices | ||
9.3 | Identification of equivalent competitor products | ||
9.3.1 | Search methodology | ||
9.3.2 | Evidence for equivalence of the devices | ||
9.4 | Equivalent products | ||
10 | Clinical data | ||
10.1 | Sources of clinical data | ||
10.1.1 | Pre-market sources of clinical data | ||
10.1.2 | Post-market sources of clinical data | ||
10.2 | Clinical investigations | ||
10.3 | Evaluation of clinical performance and risks in the context of medical literature | ||
10.3.1 | Methodology of literature search | ||
10.3.2 | Search and selection results | ||
10.4 | Identification, analysis and appraisal of relevant available clinical data | ||
10.5 | Appropriate level of clinical evidence in view of the characteristics of the device and its intended purpose | ||
10.6 | Examination of qualitative and quantitative aspects of clinical safety and performance | ||
10.7 | Medical literature review | ||
10.7.1 | Clinical benefits of subject device and equivalents | ||
10.7.2 | Risks and limitations associated with subject device and equivalentsd> | ||
10.8 | Risks and limitations associated with device componenets | ||
10.8.1 | State of the art in context of medical literature review | ||
10.9 | Evaluation of clinical performance and risks in the context of market surveillance | ||
10.9.1 | Market surveillance by manufacturer | ||
10.9.1.1 | Number of devices sold | ||
10.9.1.2 | Summary of nonconformities, recalls, and incidents | ||
10.9.1.3 | Customer feedback | ||
10.9.2 | Market surveillance by authorities | ||
11 | Benefit-risk analysis | ||
11.1 | Evaluation of the description of the intended purpose of the device | ||
11.2 | Evaluation of the device’s benefits to the patient | ||
11.3 | Evaluation of the device's benefits compared with the alternative devices | ||
11.4 | Quantification of benefits to the patients | ||
11.5 | Evaluation of the clinical risks of the device | ||
11.6 | Evaluation of clinical risks of the device compared with the alternative devices | ||
11.7 | Benefit-risk issues relating to specific components | ||
11.8 | Evaluation of information supplied with the device | ||
11.9 | Acceptability of the benefit-risk ratio for the indications and intended purpose of the device | ||
12 | Clinical follow-up | ||
13 | Conclusion | ||
14 | Appendices | ||
14.1 | Appendix 1: list of documents reviewed for the purpose of this clinical evaluation | ||
14.2 | Appendix 2: CV of the author | ||
14.3 | Appendix 3: List of references |
Clinical evaluation involves conducting a scientific literature search and appraisal to gather and analyze relevant clinical data. This process ensures that the safety and performance of a medical device are supported by evidence. The findings from this evaluation must be documented, either directly within the Clinical Evaluation Report or in a separate, detailed document, to comply with regulatory requirements.
1 | Background | ||
2 | Methodology of literature search | ||
2.1 | Positive search words (depending on search method) | ||
2.2 | Negative search words (depending on search method) | ||
3 | Number of hits | ||
4 | Relevance of publications | ||
5 | Literature search summary | ||
6 | Appropriate level of clinical evidence and strength of the evidence | ||
7 | Literature appraisal summary and conclusion |
Partner with us, and let our regulatory expertise guide you towards regulatory success in Europe!
We're ready to help you. Contact us whether you have a question about our solutions or need help with regulatory issues