Or use the contact form below
Clinical evaluation stands as a cornerstone in ensuring the safety and performance of medical devices throughout their lifecycle. This process involves the systematic assessment of clinical data to establish and confirm the device's clinical safety and performance.
Clinical evaluation is not just a best practice but a regulatory requirement under the European Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR). It serves as a critical component for obtaining and maintaining CE marking.
PMCF is an extension of the clinical evaluation process. It involves the systematic collection and evaluation of clinical data on a medical device after it has been placed on the market. The insights gained from PMCF activities help confirm the continued safety and performance of the device in real-world scenarios.
Also, clinical evaluation feeds into the broader landscape of post-market surveillance (PMS). By continuously monitoring the device's performance through PMS, manufacturers can validate and update their clinical evaluation, ensuring that it remains reflective of the device's real-world performance.
Conducting clinical evaluation is one of the main requirements of MDR 2017/745, which applies to all manufacturers and to all classes and types of medical devices (including class I). Accordingly, no matter what medical devices you sell in the European Union, you need to conduct a clinical evaluation of these products.
According to MDR 2017/745, clinical evaluation of a medical device is a systematic and carefully planned process aimed at the continuous collection of clinical data relating to the clinical use of a medical device, as well as their analysis and evaluation with the aim of continuously monitoring the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Clinical evaluation must be carried out by a suitably qualified person or persons. The main requirements for an expert conducting a clinical evaluation are as follows:
Clinical evaluation should be based on a clear scientific methodology, which should be described in a Clinical evaluation plan. The outcome of the clinical evaluation conducted in accordance with this plan is a Clinical evaluation report. The main data analyzed during the clinical assessment are as follows:
The analysis and conclusions of a clinical assessment must be well structured and scientifically substantiated.
PMCF (Post-market clinical follow-up) is the process of continually updating clinical data collected and analyzed as part of a clinical evaluation. Hence, the PMCF is a continuation of the clinical evaluation process at the stage when the product already has a CE mark and is sold in the European Union.
Like clinical evaluation, PMCF requires planning and is conducted based on a Post-Marketing Clinical Followup Plan (PMCF plan). As part of the PMCF, the following data is assessed:
The processes of clinical evaluation, PMCF and post-marketing surveillance form a single system, the task of which is to continuously monitor the effectiveness and safety of a medical device on the market in the European Union. The system must ensure continued compliance of the medical device with the General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPR) set out in Annex 1 to MDR 2017/745.
PMS (Post-market surveillance system) is a system that every manufacturer of medical devices selling their products in the European Union is required to have. Having a PMS for a particular product is a prerequisite that must be met in order to be eligible to apply CE marking to it. This requirement is set out in MDR 2017/745.
The manufacturer is required to plan, implement and document the post-market surveillance system for each product marketed in the EU. The PMS features for each individual product are determined by the product type and class.
The post-market surveillance system must be integrated into the quality management system and is a part of it. Its main goal is the systematic and active collection, analysis and documentation of information relating to the quality, effectiveness and safety of a medical device at the entire post-registration stage of its life cycle.
Based on the results of the PMS processes, the manufacturer determines the need for corrective and preventive actions. In particular, post-marketing surveillance data is used to:
The main PMS documents are the Post-market surveillance plan and Post-market surveillance reports (for class I) or Periodic Safety Update Report or PSUR (for higher classes). The frequency of PMS reporting is determined by the characteristics of the medical device.
The importance of clinical evaluation extends far beyond the initial stages of device development. It forms an inseparable link with PMCF and PMS, collectively shaping a holistic approach to ensuring the ongoing safety and effectiveness of medical devices. Embracing this holistic view not only meets regulatory requirements but, more importantly, fosters a culture of continuous improvement and commitment to patient welfare.
Notified body
certificate
Learn more >>
Basic UDI
Learn more >>
EUDAMED registration
Learn more >>
Contact us >>
CE-marking process under MDR
Learn more >>
CE-marking process under IVDR
Learn more >>
MDR checklist
Learn more >>
Clinical evaluation stands as a cornerstone in ensuring the safety and performance of medical devices throughout their lifecycle. This process involves the systematic assessment of clinical data to establish and confirm the device's clinical safety and performance.
Clinical evaluation is not just a best practice but a regulatory requirement under the European Medical Device Regulation (MDR) and In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR). It serves as a critical component for obtaining and maintaining CE marking.
PMCF is an extension of the clinical evaluation process. It involves the systematic collection and evaluation of clinical data on a medical device after it has been placed on the market. The insights gained from PMCF activities help confirm the continued safety and performance of the device in real-world scenarios.
Also, clinical evaluation feeds into the broader landscape of post-market surveillance (PMS). By continuously monitoring the device's performance through PMS, manufacturers can validate and update their clinical evaluation, ensuring that it remains reflective of the device's real-world performance.
Conducting clinical evaluation is one of the main requirements of MDR 2017/745, which applies to all manufacturers and to all classes and types of medical devices (including class I). Accordingly, no matter what medical devices you sell in the European Union, you need to conduct a clinical evaluation of these products.
According to MDR 2017/745, clinical evaluation of a medical device is a systematic and carefully planned process aimed at the continuous collection of clinical data relating to the clinical use of a medical device, as well as their analysis and evaluation with the aim of continuously monitoring the safety and effectiveness of the device.
Clinical evaluation must be carried out by a suitably qualified person or persons. The main requirements for an expert conducting a clinical evaluation are as follows:
Clinical evaluation should be based on a clear scientific methodology, which should be described in a Clinical evaluation plan. The outcome of the clinical evaluation conducted in accordance with this plan is a Clinical evaluation report. The main data analyzed during the clinical assessment are as follows:
The analysis and conclusions of a clinical assessment must be well structured and scientifically substantiated.
PMCF (Post-market clinical follow-up) is the process of continually updating clinical data collected and analyzed as part of a clinical evaluation. Hence, the PMCF is a continuation of the clinical evaluation process at the stage when the product already has a CE mark and is sold in the European Union.
Like clinical evaluation, PMCF requires planning and is conducted based on a Post-Marketing Clinical Followup Plan (PMCF plan). As part of the PMCF, the following data is assessed:
The processes of clinical evaluation, PMCF and post-marketing surveillance form a single system, the task of which is to continuously monitor the effectiveness and safety of a medical device on the market in the European Union. The system must ensure continued compliance of the medical device with the General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPR) set out in Annex 1 to MDR 2017/745.
PMS (Post-market surveillance system) is a system that every manufacturer of medical devices selling their products in the European Union is required to have. Having a PMS for a particular product is a prerequisite that must be met in order to be eligible to apply CE marking to it. This requirement is set out in MDR 2017/745.
The manufacturer is required to plan, implement and document the post-market surveillance system for each product marketed in the EU. The PMS features for each individual product are determined by the product type and class.
The post-market surveillance system must be integrated into the quality management system and is a part of it. Its main goal is the systematic and active collection, analysis and documentation of information relating to the quality, effectiveness and safety of a medical device at the entire post-registration stage of its life cycle.
Based on the results of the PMS processes, the manufacturer determines the need for corrective and preventive actions. In particular, post-marketing surveillance data is used to:
The main PMS documents are the Post-market surveillance plan and Post-market surveillance reports (for class I) or Periodic Safety Update Report or PSUR (for higher classes). The frequency of PMS reporting is determined by the characteristics of the medical device.
The importance of clinical evaluation extends far beyond the initial stages of device development. It forms an inseparable link with PMCF and PMS, collectively shaping a holistic approach to ensuring the ongoing safety and effectiveness of medical devices. Embracing this holistic view not only meets regulatory requirements but, more importantly, fosters a culture of continuous improvement and commitment to patient welfare.
CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate
Basic UDI-DI (bUDI) - what is it, where to obtain it, and what to do with it
EUDAMED registration - a brief guide
Contract with the Authorised Representative in the European Union (Authorised Representative Mandate)
GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements for medical devices in the European Union
How to obtain CE marking for medical software under the EU MDR or IVDR?
Technical documentation for Medical Device Software in the EU
IEC 62304 - the pivotal standard for software medical devices
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics
ISO and IEC standards for medical device software
Clinical Evaluation, PMCF, and PMS in Medical Device Lifecycle
Notified Bodies and their role in certification of medical devices
What is NANDO and why medical device companies should know about it?
Labeling and UDI requirements for medical devices in the EU
Understanding the roles of Authorised Representatives and Importers under MDR/IVDR
MDR implementation - challenges and solutions
Post-market surveillance under MDR and IVDR - requirements and best practices
Notified Body audit - a manufacturer's guide
Risk management plan - guide for medical device companies
Should my medical device comply with GDPR?
EC-certificate for a medical device - Q&A
How long does it take to CE-mark a medical device?
What is a PRRC?
Essential requirements for importers and distributors under MDR and IVDR
Language requirements for IFUs and labels under the MDR and IVDR
Legal Manufacturer and Original Equipment Manufacturer in medical devices
How to structure a PRRC contract for effective compliance
How to Create a Declaration of Conformity According to MDR or IVDR
All articles >>
Or use the contact form below