Or use the contact form below
Biological evaluation is a part of the verification and validation (V&V) process for medical devices in the European Union. Ensuring that a medical device is biocompatible—meaning it does not cause harmful biological responses—is required for meeting safety and performance requirements under the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745.
The biological evaluation process is not just about conducting tests; it follows a scientific risk-based approach that considers the interaction between the medical device and the human body throughout its entire lifecycle. This evaluation must be performed according to ISO 10993-1: Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing and must demonstrate that a device is safe for its intended purpose.
Biological evaluation is a verification and validation process, meaning it serves to:
It is closely linked to other design validation processes, such as chemical characterization, toxicological risk assessment, and clinical evaluation, ensuring that the final product is safe for patients and users.
The biological evaluation process follows a structured, risk-based approach, ensuring that only necessary tests are conducted, reducing unnecessary animal or human testing whenever possible. The key steps in this process include:
Before testing, the manufacturer must gather information on:
This step eliminates unnecessary testing if material safety can be demonstrated through existing data.
ISO 10993-1 provides a decision-making framework for biological evaluation. The standard defines biological endpoints that need to be assessed based on the device’s:
If gaps in material safety data exist, the manufacturer conducts biological tests, such as:
If chemical characterization and existing data are sufficient to demonstrate safety, some tests can be waived, reducing the need for animal studies.
A biological evaluation report (BER) is compiled, summarizing:
This report must be included in the technical documentation submitted for regulatory approval.
Biological evaluation is a core requirement under MDR 2017/745, Annex I, which mandates that medical devices must not pose unacceptable biological risks.
To comply with MDR, manufacturers must:
Biological evaluation is not just about performing standard tests—it is a logical, structured risk-management process designed to ensure that medical devices are biocompatible, safe, and effective. In the context of verification and validation (V&V), it plays a vital role in proving that devices meet EU MDR requirements.
Learn more >>
PRRC
Learn more >>
Clinical
evaluation
Learn more >>
Post-marketing
surveillance
Learn more >>
CE-marking process under MDR
Learn more >>
CE-marking process under IVDR
Learn more >>
MDR checklist
Learn more >>
Biological evaluation is a part of the verification and validation (V&V) process for medical devices in the European Union. Ensuring that a medical device is biocompatible—meaning it does not cause harmful biological responses—is required for meeting safety and performance requirements under the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745.
The biological evaluation process is not just about conducting tests; it follows a scientific risk-based approach that considers the interaction between the medical device and the human body throughout its entire lifecycle. This evaluation must be performed according to ISO 10993-1: Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing and must demonstrate that a device is safe for its intended purpose.
Biological evaluation is a verification and validation process, meaning it serves to:
It is closely linked to other design validation processes, such as chemical characterization, toxicological risk assessment, and clinical evaluation, ensuring that the final product is safe for patients and users.
The biological evaluation process follows a structured, risk-based approach, ensuring that only necessary tests are conducted, reducing unnecessary animal or human testing whenever possible. The key steps in this process include:
Before testing, the manufacturer must gather information on:
This step eliminates unnecessary testing if material safety can be demonstrated through existing data.
ISO 10993-1 provides a decision-making framework for biological evaluation. The standard defines biological endpoints that need to be assessed based on the device’s:
If gaps in material safety data exist, the manufacturer conducts biological tests, such as:
If chemical characterization and existing data are sufficient to demonstrate safety, some tests can be waived, reducing the need for animal studies.
A biological evaluation report (BER) is compiled, summarizing:
This report must be included in the technical documentation submitted for regulatory approval.
Biological evaluation is a core requirement under MDR 2017/745, Annex I, which mandates that medical devices must not pose unacceptable biological risks.
To comply with MDR, manufacturers must:
Biological evaluation is not just about performing standard tests—it is a logical, structured risk-management process designed to ensure that medical devices are biocompatible, safe, and effective. In the context of verification and validation (V&V), it plays a vital role in proving that devices meet EU MDR requirements.
Understanding MDA, MDN, MDS, and MDT codes in the context of MDR and IVDR
Do Manufacturers of Medical Device Parts and Unfinished Medical Device Products Need CE Marking?
Is liability insurance mandatory for medical device manufacturers in the EU?
Is your software a medical device or an accessory? Understanding EU MDR classification
Legacy Device Timelines and Deadlines Under IVDR Amendments
Structuring a quality management system for medical device manufacturers in the EU
How to Use NANDO to Find a Notified Body for Medical Devices
CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate
Basic UDI-DI (bUDI) - what is it, where to obtain it, and what to do with it
EUDAMED registration - a brief guide
Contract with the Authorised Representative in the European Union (Authorised Representative Mandate)
GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements for medical devices in the European Union
How to obtain CE marking for medical software under the EU MDR or IVDR?
Technical documentation for Medical Device Software in the EU
IEC 62304 - the pivotal standard for software medical devices
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics
ISO and IEC standards for medical device software
Clinical Evaluation, PMCF, and PMS in Medical Device Lifecycle
Notified Bodies and their role in certification of medical devices
What is NANDO and why medical device companies should know about it?
Labeling and UDI requirements for medical devices in the EU
Understanding the roles of Authorised Representatives and Importers under MDR/IVDR
MDR implementation - challenges and solutions
Post-market surveillance under MDR and IVDR - requirements and best practices
Notified Body audit - a manufacturer's guide
Risk management plan - guide for medical device companies
Should my medical device comply with GDPR?
EC-certificate for a medical device - Q&A
How long does it take to CE-mark a medical device?
What is a PRRC?
Essential requirements for importers and distributors under MDR and IVDR
Language requirements for IFUs and labels under the MDR and IVDR
Legal Manufacturer and Original Equipment Manufacturer in medical devices
How to structure a PRRC contract for effective compliance
How to Create a Declaration of Conformity According to MDR or IVDR
All articles >>
We're ready to help you. Contact us whether you have a question about our solutions or need help with regulatory issues
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics
CE-marking process for medical devices
CE-marking process for in vitro diagnostic medical devices
UDI infographic
EUDAMED registration step by step instruction
ISO 14155:2020 structure and content
MDR-compliant technical file
MDR technical documentation checklist
IVDR technical documentation checklist
Technical documentation checklist for medical device software (MDSW)
MDR-compliant quality system documentation checklist
Clinical Evaluation Plan checklist
Clinical Evaluation Report checklist
All checklists >>
CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate
Basic UDI-DI (bUDI)
EUDAMED registration - a brief guide
Authorised Representative Mandate
GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements
How to obtain CE marking for medical software under the EU MDR or IVDR?
Technical documentation for Medical Device Software in the EU
Read more >>
We only use essential cookies that enable core functionality and proper operation of the website. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of the essential cookies. You may disable these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We do not use our own or third-party analytical, preferences, statistics, marketing, functional, advertisement, performance or any other non-essential cookies.
Or use the contact form below
Solutions
EU Authorised Representative (EC REP)
EU PRRC
Technical documentation
Risk management
Clinical evaluation
Notified Bodies
Quality management system
Post-market surveillance
Resources
Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics
CE-marking process for medical devices
CE-marking process for in vitro diagnostic medical devices
PRRC under MDR or IVDR
UDI infographic
EUDAMED registration step by step instruction
ISO 14155:2020 structure and content
MDR-compliant technical file
MDR technical documentation checklist
IVDR technical documentation checklist
Technical documentation checklist for medical device software (MDSW)
MDR-compliant quality system documentation checklist
Clinical Evaluation Plan checklist
Clinical Evaluation Report checklist
All checklists >>
Articles
CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate
Basic UDI-DI (bUDI)
EUDAMED registration - a brief guide
Authorised Representative Mandate
GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements
More articles >>
Devices
General medical devices and equipment
In vitro diagnostics (IVD)
Medical software
We only use essential cookies that enable core functionality and proper operation of the website. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of the essential cookies. You may disable these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We do not use our own or third-party analytical, preferences, statistics, marketing, functional, advertisement, performance or any other non-essential cookies.