Send us an email:
info@mdrc-services.com

Or use the contact form below

 

Biological evaluation of medical devices in the EU

Introduction to biological evaluation

Biological evaluation is a part of the verification and validation (V&V) process for medical devices in the European Union. Ensuring that a medical device is biocompatible—meaning it does not cause harmful biological responses—is required for meeting safety and performance requirements under the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745.

The biological evaluation process is not just about conducting tests; it follows a scientific risk-based approach that considers the interaction between the medical device and the human body throughout its entire lifecycle. This evaluation must be performed according to ISO 10993-1: Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing and must demonstrate that a device is safe for its intended purpose.

Biological evaluation in the context of verification and validation

Biological evaluation is a verification and validation process, meaning it serves to:

  • Verify that the medical device is designed and manufactured in a way that prevents unwanted biological effects.
  • Validate that it meets regulatory and safety requirements before market release.

It is closely linked to other design validation processes, such as chemical characterization, toxicological risk assessment, and clinical evaluation, ensuring that the final product is safe for patients and users.

Logic behind the biological evaluation process

The biological evaluation process follows a structured, risk-based approach, ensuring that only necessary tests are conducted, reducing unnecessary animal or human testing whenever possible. The key steps in this process include:

1. Material characterization and risk assessment

Before testing, the manufacturer must gather information on:

  • Device composition (materials, coatings, adhesives).
  • Manufacturing processes (including sterilization, surface treatments).
  • Expected patient contact (duration, frequency, and exposure sites).

This step eliminates unnecessary testing if material safety can be demonstrated through existing data.

2. Determination of biological risks based on ISO 10993-1

ISO 10993-1 provides a decision-making framework for biological evaluation. The standard defines biological endpoints that need to be assessed based on the device’s:

  • Nature of body contact (e.g., skin, mucous membrane, blood).
  • Duration of contact (e.g., short-term, prolonged, permanent).

3. Biological testing (if required)

If gaps in material safety data exist, the manufacturer conducts biological tests, such as:

  • Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5) – Evaluates if materials cause cell damage.
  • Sensitization (ISO 10993-10) – Identifies allergic reactions.
  • Irritation (ISO 10993-10) – Tests for local tissue irritation.
  • Systemic toxicity (ISO 10993-11) – Assesses potential toxic effects on organs.

If chemical characterization and existing data are sufficient to demonstrate safety, some tests can be waived, reducing the need for animal studies.

4. Justification of biocompatibility

A biological evaluation report (BER) is compiled, summarizing:

  • Data from material characterization.
  • Risk assessment findings.
  • Testing results (if applicable).
  • Rationale for omitting tests (if applicable).

This report must be included in the technical documentation submitted for regulatory approval.

How biological evaluation ensures compliance with MDR

Biological evaluation is a core requirement under MDR 2017/745, Annex I, which mandates that medical devices must not pose unacceptable biological risks.

To comply with MDR, manufacturers must:

  • Follow a science-based, risk-driven approach aligned with ISO 10993-1.
  • Ensure complete documentation of biological risks and mitigation strategies.
  • Justify the selection or omission of tests in the context of intended use.
  • Demonstrate long-term biocompatibility, particularly for implantable devices.

Biological evaluation is not just about performing standard tests—it is a logical, structured risk-management process designed to ensure that medical devices are biocompatible, safe, and effective. In the context of verification and validation (V&V), it plays a vital role in proving that devices meet EU MDR requirements.

We will help you obtain all the necessary certificates.

Learn more >>

What you need to have to succeed in certification and sell your products in the EU:

PRRC

Learn more >>

Clinical
evaluation
Learn more >>

Post-marketing
surveillance
Learn more >>

What you need to know to succeed in certification and sell your products in the EU:

CE-marking process under MDR

Learn more >>

CE-marking process under IVDR

Learn more >>

MDR checklist
Learn more >>

Biological evaluation of medical devices in the EU

Introduction to biological evaluation

Biological evaluation is a part of the verification and validation (V&V) process for medical devices in the European Union. Ensuring that a medical device is biocompatible—meaning it does not cause harmful biological responses—is required for meeting safety and performance requirements under the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745.

The biological evaluation process is not just about conducting tests; it follows a scientific risk-based approach that considers the interaction between the medical device and the human body throughout its entire lifecycle. This evaluation must be performed according to ISO 10993-1: Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing and must demonstrate that a device is safe for its intended purpose.

Biological evaluation in the context of verification and validation

Biological evaluation is a verification and validation process, meaning it serves to:

  • Verify that the medical device is designed and manufactured in a way that prevents unwanted biological effects.
  • Validate that it meets regulatory and safety requirements before market release.

It is closely linked to other design validation processes, such as chemical characterization, toxicological risk assessment, and clinical evaluation, ensuring that the final product is safe for patients and users.

Logic behind the biological evaluation process

The biological evaluation process follows a structured, risk-based approach, ensuring that only necessary tests are conducted, reducing unnecessary animal or human testing whenever possible. The key steps in this process include:

1. Material characterization and risk assessment

Before testing, the manufacturer must gather information on:

  • Device composition (materials, coatings, adhesives).
  • Manufacturing processes (including sterilization, surface treatments).
  • Expected patient contact (duration, frequency, and exposure sites).

This step eliminates unnecessary testing if material safety can be demonstrated through existing data.

2. Determination of biological risks based on ISO 10993-1

ISO 10993-1 provides a decision-making framework for biological evaluation. The standard defines biological endpoints that need to be assessed based on the device’s:

  • Nature of body contact (e.g., skin, mucous membrane, blood).
  • Duration of contact (e.g., short-term, prolonged, permanent).

3. Biological testing (if required)

If gaps in material safety data exist, the manufacturer conducts biological tests, such as:

  • Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5) – Evaluates if materials cause cell damage.
  • Sensitization (ISO 10993-10) – Identifies allergic reactions.
  • Irritation (ISO 10993-10) – Tests for local tissue irritation.
  • Systemic toxicity (ISO 10993-11) – Assesses potential toxic effects on organs.

If chemical characterization and existing data are sufficient to demonstrate safety, some tests can be waived, reducing the need for animal studies.

4. Justification of biocompatibility

A biological evaluation report (BER) is compiled, summarizing:

  • Data from material characterization.
  • Risk assessment findings.
  • Testing results (if applicable).
  • Rationale for omitting tests (if applicable).

This report must be included in the technical documentation submitted for regulatory approval.

How biological evaluation ensures compliance with MDR

Biological evaluation is a core requirement under MDR 2017/745, Annex I, which mandates that medical devices must not pose unacceptable biological risks.

To comply with MDR, manufacturers must:

  • Follow a science-based, risk-driven approach aligned with ISO 10993-1.
  • Ensure complete documentation of biological risks and mitigation strategies.
  • Justify the selection or omission of tests in the context of intended use.
  • Demonstrate long-term biocompatibility, particularly for implantable devices.

Biological evaluation is not just about performing standard tests—it is a logical, structured risk-management process designed to ensure that medical devices are biocompatible, safe, and effective. In the context of verification and validation (V&V), it plays a vital role in proving that devices meet EU MDR requirements.

Further reading

CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate

Basic UDI-DI (bUDI) - what is it, where to obtain it, and what to do with it

EUDAMED registration - a brief guide

Contract with the Authorised Representative in the European Union (Authorised Representative Mandate)

GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements for medical devices in the European Union

How to obtain CE marking for medical software under the EU MDR or IVDR?

Technical documentation for Medical Device Software in the EU

IEC 62304 - the pivotal standard for software medical devices

Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics

ISO and IEC standards for medical device software

Clinical Evaluation, PMCF, and PMS in Medical Device Lifecycle

Notified Bodies and their role in certification of medical devices

What is NANDO and why medical device companies should know about it?

Labeling and UDI requirements for medical devices in the EU

Understanding the roles of Authorised Representatives and Importers under MDR/IVDR

MDR implementation - challenges and solutions

Post-market surveillance under MDR and IVDR - requirements and best practices

Notified Body audit - a manufacturer's guide

Risk management plan - guide for medical device companies

Should my medical device comply with GDPR?

EC-certificate for a medical device - Q&A

How long does it take to CE-mark a medical device?

What is a PRRC?

Essential requirements for importers and distributors under MDR and IVDR

Language requirements for IFUs and labels under the MDR and IVDR

Legal Manufacturer and Original Equipment Manufacturer in medical devices

How to structure a PRRC contract for effective compliance

How to Create a Declaration of Conformity According to MDR or IVDR

All articles >>

Get in touch

We're ready to help you. Contact us whether you have a question about our solutions or need help with regulatory issues

Our EU office

MedDev Compliance Ltd
Souliou 1, Strovolos, 2018 Nicosia, Cyprus
Phone: +357 22253765
Email: info@mdrc-services.com
 

©2025 MDRC - Medical Devices Regulatory Compliance

Useful information

CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate

Basic UDI-DI (bUDI)

EUDAMED registration - a brief guide

Authorised Representative Mandate

GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements

How to obtain CE marking for medical software under the EU MDR or IVDR?

Technical documentation for Medical Device Software in the EU

Read more >>


Cookie Policy

We only use essential cookies that enable core functionality and proper operation of the website. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of the essential cookies. You may disable these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We do not use our own or third-party analytical, preferences, statistics, marketing, functional, advertisement, performance or any other non-essential cookies.

Send us an email:
info@mdrc-services.com

Or use the contact form below

 

Solutions

EU Authorised Representative (EC REP)

EU PRRC

Technical documentation

Risk management

Clinical evaluation

Notified Bodies

Quality management system

Post-market surveillance

Resources

Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics

CE-marking process for medical devices

CE-marking process for in vitro diagnostic medical devices

PRRC under MDR or IVDR

UDI infographic

EUDAMED registration step by step instruction

ISO 14155:2020 structure and content

MDR-compliant technical file

Checklists

MDR technical documentation checklist

IVDR technical documentation checklist

Technical documentation checklist for medical device software (MDSW)

MDR-compliant quality system documentation checklist

Clinical Evaluation Plan checklist

Clinical Evaluation Report checklist

All checklists >>

Articles

CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate

Basic UDI-DI (bUDI)

EUDAMED registration - a brief guide

Authorised Representative Mandate

GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements

More articles >>

Devices

General medical devices and equipment

In vitro diagnostics (IVD)

Medical software

Cookie Policy

We only use essential cookies that enable core functionality and proper operation of the website. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of the essential cookies. You may disable these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We do not use our own or third-party analytical, preferences, statistics, marketing, functional, advertisement, performance or any other non-essential cookies.