MDRC logo
Explore
← Knowledge centre

EU MDR · Annex VIII · 22 rules

How to determine a medical device class

A device class is not chosen from the product name. It follows from the intended purpose and every applicable MDR rule.

Classification determines the conformity assessment route, whether a Notified Body must be involved and how deeply an external assessor reviews the device. Two Class I devices can follow different procedures, while a small change to the intended purpose can move a product into a higher class.

Updated 25 September 2026 14-minute guide Two worked examples
Work through the classification ↓
CLASSIFICATIONPURPOSE · RULES · HIGHEST CLASS
  1. 01
    INPUT

    Intended purpose and mode of action

  2. 02
    CHARACTERISTICS

    Invasiveness, duration and active status

  3. 03
    RULES

    Every applicable provision from 1 to 22

  4. 04
    RESULT

    The highest resulting class

IIIaIIbIII

When to determine the class

At the beginning of development, not just before submission

Until the class is known, the manufacturer cannot reliably select the conformity assessment route, determine whether a Notified Body is required or plan the evidence package.

Preliminary classification should begin as soon as the intended purpose is sufficiently specific. It should define the medical purpose, patients, users, indications, contraindications, anatomical site, duration and environment of use, and the device’s mode of action.

The decision must be reconsidered when the intended purpose, design or mode of use changes. A new software function, another route of administration, longer contact or use in the central circulatory system can activate a different rule and change the class.

PRACTICAL RULE

Fix the intended purpose and classification characteristics first. Apply Annex VIII only after that. Choosing a class to fit a preferred budget creates contradictions between the labelling, clinical evaluation, risk management and technical documentation.

Classification principles

The MDR links risk to purpose and operation, not to the product name

Article 51 divides devices into Classes I, IIa, IIb and III. The actual decision is made under Annex VIII, including its definitions, implementing rules and every relevant classification rule.

01

Intended purpose

The medical purpose of the device, the target population and the conditions of use.

02

Invasiveness

Whether the device enters the body, through which route and whether entry is surgical.

03

Duration

Transient use under 60 minutes, short-term use from 60 minutes to 30 days or long-term use over 30 days.

04

Active operation

Whether operation depends on energy other than that generated by the human body or gravity.

05

Anatomical site

Direct contact with the heart, central circulatory system or central nervous system can raise the class.

06

Special action

Medicinal substances, biological effects, nanomaterials, contraception or software-driven decisions.

I

Low risk

Ordinary Class I generally permits self-assessment. For Is, Im and Ir, a Notified Body assesses only the relevant special aspects.

IIa

Moderate risk

A Notified Body participates in conformity assessment. The technical-documentation review depends on the chosen route and device group.

IIb

Higher risk

Notified Body involvement and a more extensive assessment of the quality system and technical documentation are required.

III

High risk

The strictest route applies, including Notified Body assessment and additional procedures for certain devices.

IMPORTANT

Is, Im and Ir are not separate risk classes. They identify Class I devices placed on the market in sterile condition, devices with a measuring function and reusable surgical instruments. Ordinary Class I follows the simpler route, not the more demanding one.

The 22 rules in Annex VIII

Every applicable rule must be checked

The rules are arranged in four groups. You can begin with the group matching the device design, but you cannot stop at the first apparent match.

01–04NON-INVASIVE

Contact without entry

These rules address contact with injured skin or mucosa and the channelling, storage or modification of blood, liquids, cells and tissues.

05–08INVASIVE

Body orifices, surgery and implantation

The outcome depends on the route of entry, duration, anatomical site and the specific exceptions in each rule.

09–13ACTIVE

Energy, monitoring and software

These rules cover therapeutic action, diagnosis, monitoring, administration or removal of substances and the effect of information on decisions.

14–22SPECIAL

Categories with particular risks

Medicinal substances, contraception, disinfection, tissues, nanomaterials, substance-based devices and closed-loop systems.

  1. 01
    FIX

    Write one precise intended purpose

    Define the medical purpose, users, patients, anatomical site, environment and duration of use.

  2. 02
    QUALIFY

    Confirm that the product falls under the MDR

    Determine separately whether it is a medical device, an accessory or a product without an intended medical purpose listed in Annex XVI.

  3. 03
    CHARACTERISE

    Record the classification characteristics

    Address invasiveness, duration, active status, implantation, critical anatomical sites, software functions and special substances.

  4. 04
    APPLY

    Test every potentially relevant rule

    For every accepted and rejected rule, retain a short rationale tied to the intended purpose and design.

  5. 05
    COMPARE

    Select the strictest result

    If several rules or sub-rules apply, the final result is the provision leading to the higher class.

  6. 06
    DOCUMENT

    Connect the class to the regulatory route

    Record the rule, sub-rule, class, any special Class I category and the effect on conformity assessment.

RULE 11

Software requires a separate analysis

Software providing information used for diagnostic or therapeutic decisions is generally Class IIa. If an incorrect decision could cause death or irreversible deterioration of health, it is Class III; if it could cause serious deterioration of health or require surgical intervention, it is Class IIb. Software monitoring physiological processes is generally IIa, except monitoring of vital parameters where variations could result in immediate danger, which is IIb. Other medical device software is Class I.

Worked examples

The same class can still mean two different routes

The original article examples are retained below. Each conclusion is valid only for the stated assumptions. A change to the purpose, design, sterile status or reuse conditions requires a new analysis.

Surgical drill bit
Example 01 · Surgical drill bit
CLASS I · RULE 6 · CATEGORY Ir

Reusable surgical drill bit

Assume that this is a non-active drill bit that surgically penetrates to bone, is used for less than 60 minutes, is supplied non-sterile and is intended for repeated use after appropriate reprocessing.

  1. 01

    Rules 1–4 for non-invasive devices do not determine the result because the drill bit is surgically invasive.

  2. 02

    Rule 5 addresses entry through a body orifice and does not fit this mode of use.

  3. 03

    Under Rule 6, a surgically invasive device for transient use is normally Class IIa.

  4. 04

    The Rule 6 exception places a reusable surgical instrument in Class I.

  5. 05

    If no other rule produces a higher class, the result is Class I in the special Ir category.

WHAT CHANGES THE RESULT

A single-use drill bit does not qualify for the reusable-instrument exception and will generally be IIa under Rule 6. For Ir, a Notified Body assesses the reuse-related aspects. Sterile supply additionally brings sterile aspects into its scope. The active drive unit is classified separately.

Orthotic insole
Example 02 · Orthotic insole
CLASS I · RULE 1 · SELF-ASSESSMENT

Mass-produced orthotic insole

Assume that the insole is a mass-produced, non-sterile device that contacts intact skin only, has no measuring function and contains no active components.

  1. 01

    The device does not enter the body and is non-invasive.

  2. 02

    Rule 1 places non-invasive devices in Class I unless Rule 2, 3 or 4 applies.

  3. 03

    Under the stated characteristics, the later rules do not produce a higher class.

  4. 04

    The result is ordinary Class I without an Is, Im or Ir designation.

  5. 05

    The manufacturer normally self-assesses conformity, draws up the EU declaration of conformity and affixes the CE marking without a Notified Body.

WHAT MUST BE CLARIFIED

An individually manufactured insole may qualify for the custom-made-device route and would not bear the CE marking. Sensors, a measuring function, active correction or a different intended purpose require separate qualification and classification.

DEVICE

Reusable surgical drill bit

Class I, Rule 6, Ir
DEVICE

Mass-produced orthotic insole

Class I, Rule 1
KEY DIFFERENCE

Ir requires limited Notified Body involvement. Ordinary Class I generally follows self-assessment.

Conclusion

A sound classification rationale can be checked line by line

The final class must follow from the intended purpose, classification characteristics and a specific rule—not from the commercial product name or a preferred regulatory route.

The technical documentation should retain the applicable version of the intended purpose, the relevant Annex VIII definitions, the rules considered, the reasons for applying or rejecting them, the resulting class and the conclusion on conformity assessment. If the facts change, reassess the rationale before releasing the change.

Practical questions

What most often changes the classification result

Open the question that applies to your device, intended purpose or conformity assessment route.

Who determines the class of a medical device?+

The manufacturer determines the class and documents the rationale in the technical documentation. A Notified Body reviews that rationale when it participates in the conformity assessment, but it does not replace the manufacturer’s decision. A dispute concerning application of Annex VIII is referred to the competent authority under Article 51 MDR.

Can I use the class of a similar device or its FDA classification?+

No. The MDR class must be established for the specific intended purpose, design and mode of use of the device by applying Annex VIII. A classification from another jurisdiction or the class used by a similar product may provide useful background, but it is not the classification rationale for the EU.

Can I stop after finding the first applicable rule?+

No. Every rule that could apply to the device must be considered. If several rules or several sub-rules apply, the provision resulting in the higher class governs. If a device has several intended purposes, classification is based on the most critical intended purpose.

Are Is, Im and Ir separate risk classes?+

No. They are Class I devices with special characteristics: devices placed on the market in sterile condition, devices with a measuring function and reusable surgical instruments. They remain Class I, but a Notified Body assesses the relevant special aspects.

How is medical device software classified?+

Standalone medical device software is classified according to its intended purpose, particularly under Rule 11. Software providing information used for diagnostic or therapeutic decisions is usually at least Class IIa, and can be IIb or III when an incorrect decision could have serious consequences. Software that only stores, archives or transfers data without performing a medical action may not be a medical device at all.

Can a change to the intended purpose change the class?+

Yes. New indications, a different patient population, anatomical site, duration of use, route of administration, or diagnostic or therapeutic importance of an output can activate another rule or a stricter sub-rule. Classification should be reassessed before the change is approved.

Primary sources

Check the decision against the current MDR

MDCG guidance helps manufacturers apply the rules, but it does not replace the legally binding text of the Regulation.

Confirm the route before certification begins

Need to justify the class of a specific device?

MDRC can review the intended purpose and design, apply the Annex VIII rules, prepare the documented classification rationale and connect the result to the correct conformity assessment route.

Discuss your classification ↗
↑

Discuss your regulatory pathway

Whether you are developing medical software, an AI-enabled healthcare solution, a digital health platform or a software-driven medical device, we can help define the regulatory strategy, evidence requirements and next steps.

→

Where companies need support

Regulatory strategy
Technical documentation
Clinical and performance evidence
Software lifecycle and cybersecurity
Notified Body readiness

Start a discussion

 

Regulatory support for software medical devices, AI health technologies and digital healthcare solutions.


©2026 MDRC - Medical Devices Regulatory Compliance

Useful information

CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate

Basic UDI-DI (bUDI)

EUDAMED registration - a brief guide

Authorised Representative Mandate

GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements

How to obtain CE marking for medical software under the EU MDR or IVDR?

Technical documentation for Medical Device Software in the EU

Read more >>


Cookie Policy

We only use essential cookies that enable core functionality and proper operation of the website. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of the essential cookies. You may disable these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We do not use our own or third-party analytical, preferences, statistics, marketing, functional, advertisement, performance or any other non-essential cookies.

Send us an email:
info@mdrc-services.com

Or use the contact form below

 

Solutions

EU Authorised Representative (EC REP)

EU PRRC

Technical documentation

Risk management

Clinical evaluation

Notified Bodies

Quality management system

Post-market surveillance

Resources

Medical Device Regulation (MDR) - basics

CE-marking process for medical devices

CE-marking process for in vitro diagnostic medical devices

MDR technical documentation checklist

IVDR technical documentation checklist

Technical documentation checklist for medical device software (MDSW)

MDR-compliant quality system documentation checklist

MDR-compliant quality system documentation checklist for medical device software

Clinical Evaluation Plan checklist

Clinical Evaluation Report checklist

PRRC under MDR or IVDR

Articles

CE-Certificate vs. EC-Certificate

Basic UDI-DI (bUDI)

EUDAMED registration - a brief guide

Authorised Representative Mandate

GSPR – General Safety and Performance Requirements

More articles >>

Devices

General medical devices and equipment

In vitro diagnostics (IVD)

Medical software

Cookie Policy

We only use essential cookies that enable core functionality and proper operation of the website. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data. By continuing to use this website, you consent to the use of the essential cookies. You may disable these cookies by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.
We do not use our own or third-party analytical, preferences, statistics, marketing, functional, advertisement, performance or any other non-essential cookies.