Diagnostic and analytical AI
Images, signals, specimens and clinical data become information used for diagnosis or assessment.
Imaging · pathology · laboratoryAI and emerging technologies
An AI-enabled medical product is a moving relationship between data, model behaviour, clinical purpose, people and change. We help make that relationship clear enough to evaluate, evidence and control.
Every position changes the evidence and oversight needed.
A spectrum, not a category
Regulatory significance grows with the clinical consequence of the output, the degree of autonomy and the uncertainty introduced by data and change.
Images, signals, specimens and clinical data become information used for diagnosis or assessment.
Imaging · pathology · laboratoryRisk estimates, early warnings and prioritisation influence clinical and workflow decisions.
Triage · prognosis · riskClinical text and recommendations introduce new questions of boundaries, verification and oversight.
Assistants · content · foundation modelsAI influences therapy, monitoring or device operation with limited human intervention.
Control · automation · personalisationEvidence spine
A model metric cannot carry the clinical claim by itself. The evidence must form one traceable line from the origin of the data to the action taken by the user.
Provenance, quality, representativeness, labelling and governance.
Independent testing, robustness, subgroup performance and limitations.
Population, environment, claims, benefit and meaningful endpoints.
Transparency, usability, automation bias, oversight and response.
Regulatory horizon
The foundation can be shared. Qualification, submissions and lifecycle obligations cannot simply be copied from one market to the other.
Device qualification and classification, conformity assessment, AI Act role and requirements, technical documentation and post-market duties.
Device class and product code, submission route, evidence expectations and a predetermined change control plan where appropriate.
MDRC support
We connect regulatory strategy with model development, software lifecycle, clinical evidence and post-market monitoring. The objective is not only a first submission, but a defensible route for every meaningful update that follows.
Talk to MDRCPurpose, claims, users, boundaries and route.
Data, performance, clinical and human-factors evidence.
Validated version, transparency and documented controls.
Drift, feedback, incidents and real-world performance.
Planned updates, retraining and regulatory assessment.
Whether you are developing medical software, an AI-enabled healthcare solution, a digital health platform or a software-driven medical device, we can help define the regulatory strategy, evidence requirements and next steps.
Or use the contact form below